MONROVIA – The Citizens Movement for Change (CMC), the newly formed political party led by Nimba County District #7 Representative Musa Hassan Bility, is showing deep signs of internal fracture as two influential executives tendered their immediate resignations on Friday, October 31, 2025. The departures of Abraham V. Sheriff, CMC Chairperson for Dubai, and William Henry Kennedy, USA Mobilization Chairperson, have intensified questions about transparency and accountability within the party’s leadership.
Both men were regarded as powerful mobilizers who brought significant numbers into the CMC’s ranks both at home and abroad. Their resignations, obtained by Smart News Liberia, cite concerns that mirror persistent criticisms leveled against the party in recent months. Kennedy, in his letter dated October 31, wrote that the decision was driven by the CMC’s “consistent failure to uphold its core values of transparency and accountability,” noting that recent developments “reinforced my concerns about the party’s commitment to driving genuine change in Liberia.”
Kennedy lamented what he described as a troubling absence of effective leadership and expressed deep disappointment in the party’s inability to implement the principles enshrined in its own constitution. While expressing gratitude for opportunities to serve, he concluded that it was time to move on, hoping the party would rediscover its founding ideals. His departure shocked many supporters in the diaspora, where he had played a central organizing role.
The resignation of Abraham V. Sheriff carried an equally forceful tone. In a letter titled “A Call for Change: A Leadership’s Legacy Lost,” Sheriff accused the party of “brazen betrayal” of its founding values. He said that during his tenure as Dubai Chairperson, he witnessed the CMC’s “apologetic disregard” for transparency and accountability and described the leadership’s silence in the face of internal concerns as “deafening.” Sheriff said the pattern of dismissing legitimate concerns had eroded his confidence in the party’s ability to deliver genuine change.
Sheriff further criticized what he called a disconnect between the party’s public messaging and its internal conduct. He said the leadership’s actions had resulted in widespread disillusionment and warned that the party’s survival depended on real reforms, not rhetoric. Although he thanked members who worked tirelessly with him, he made clear that he could no longer associate with a movement that had “forgotten the very principles that once drove it forward.”
These twin resignations mark the latest in a string of departures that have rattled the young movement. Just days ago, Madam Grace R. Guar, a founding member and former USA/Canada Diaspora Chairperson, resigned, also citing transparency-related issues. Her departure raised alarms within the party’s support base, especially among those who joined because of her reputation, influence, and leadership style.
The party’s press release acknowledging Guar’s exit sought to downplay internal tensions, expressing “heartfelt appreciation” for her service but avoiding any mention of the reasons behind her decision. This omission has fueled speculation about how deeply the problems run within the CMC hierarchy. For many, Guar’s silence on specifics underscored a growing pattern: internal concerns are either ignored or glossed over rather than addressed.
One CMC supporter, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Guar’s departure left many members shaken. In a private letter addressed to her, the supporter wrote, “Your departure has left me feeling uncertain and lost. Your leadership was more than just about guiding the organization; it was about building relationships and fostering a sense of community.” The emotional reaction reflects how significant Guar’s presence was in shaping the identity and culture of the movement.
The mass resignations present the biggest challenge yet to Musa Bility’s leadership. The exodus of high-profile mobilizers, especially in key diaspora communities, suggests that the CMC’s internal cohesion may be weakening at a critical early stage. With elections approaching and the political climate intensifying, the party can ill afford cracks at the top.
Supporters who once believed the CMC represented a fresh start in Liberian politics now worry that the party may be falling victim to the same pitfalls it sought to challenge. Bility, whose leadership style has often drawn scrutiny, is now under mounting pressure to publicly address the concerns raised and implement corrective measures that could stabilize the party.
Despite the turmoil, some insiders believe the CMC still has time to recover, if decisive action is taken. They argue that acknowledging internal grievances and committing to transparent reforms could restore confidence. However, others warn that continued silence from the leadership could deepen mistrust and accelerate further resignations.
For now, the future of the Citizens Movement for Change remains uncertain. What is clear is that Bility faces one of the most defining tests of his political career. The decisions he makes in the coming days will determine whether the CMC regains its footing or becomes another cautionary tale of internal collapse within Liberia’s political landscape.
