MONROVIA – A senior stalwart of the Congress for Democratic Change (CDC), Charles McArthur Gull, has ignited a political firestorm after openly calling for the removal of former President George Manneh Weah as political leader of the party. In a Facebook post on Monday, December 1, 2025, the former Port of Buchanan Manager unleashed one of the most blistering internal critiques yet, arguing that the CDC can never reclaim state power in 2029 under what he described as Weah’s “weak and passive” leadership style.
Gull’s remarks underscore a growing frustration within segments of the CDC base, where some partisans believe the party has not mounted a forceful enough opposition to the ruling Unity Party (UP). In his message, Gull insisted that a more aggressive approach is necessary for the CDC to remain politically competitive. “We need to stage a serious movement to remove President George Weah as CDC political leader,” he wrote, warning that the party risks slipping into irrelevance if it does not reorganize itself before the next elections.
The longtime CDC insider did not hold back in his criticism of the party’s standard-bearer, describing Weah as a leader unfit for the political battles ahead. According to Gull, “The man is too peaceful, too soft, and too weak for the kind of political warfare Liberia is in right now.” He argued that the Unity Party would exploit this perceived softness to dominate the political landscape without resistance, noting that “Unity Party will do anything they want and walk free, 2029 will be a free lunch for them.”
Gull’s post suggests that internal dissatisfaction is being fueled by a belief that Weah has failed to defend CDC members who are facing legal and political challenges under the Boakai administration. He expressed frustration that individuals close to Weah are being investigated or prosecuted while the former president remains silent. “Look around: his wife is on the verge of being implicated, his partisans are being dragged to court, his closest allies are being humiliated, and the man is just sitting there saying nothing,” Gull stated.
The CDC stalwart argued that the party needs a radically different brand of leadership that is confrontational, strategic, and unapologetically tough in its pursuit of political power. Gull criticized Weah’s calm demeanor, saying, “CDC needs a radical, strong, forceful leader, not someone who just smiles and watches the house burn.” His comments highlight a widening ideological divide between those favoring a more militant opposition posture and those advocating a measured tone.
Gull accused Weah of failing to protect his political legacy and the future of the CDC. He wrote that the former president must “go sit down and protect whatever legacy he thinks he has left,” warning that remaining at the helm would jeopardize the party’s prospects. His warning to CDC members was blunt, declaring that “if we continue with him at the front, CDC will not smell state power again.”
The Facebook post also reflected the growing sentiment among grassroots supporters who believe the CDC’s current approach is too passive. Gull cautioned partisans not to rely on Weah if they intend to return to power. “If CDC is depending on George Weah to bring them back to power, my brother, start preparing your market table, because politics is not for the weak,” he said, sparking heated debates on social media platforms.
Gull’s comments could mark the beginning of a deeper internal crisis within Liberia’s largest opposition bloc. While criticism of Weah’s leadership has surfaced before, few prominent figures have spoken as directly and forcefully as Gull. His remarks raise questions about whether the party may soon face a major reorganization or a possible leadership challenge.
Supporters of the former president, however, argued in various Facebook comments that Weah remains the most influential and unifying figure within the CDC and suggested that any attempt to remove him could further fracture the party. They maintained that the CDC’s strength lies in Weah’s nationwide popularity and warned that internal attacks only benefit the ruling establishment. The party is yet to formally respond to Gull’s assertions.
Gull hinted that a major mobilization effort is imminent. He concluded his statement with an assertion that many interpret as a sign of an impending internal campaign. “The unpopular but forceful movement is coming soon,” he declared, signaling what could become a defining battle for the future of the Congress for Democratic Change.
